| Initial colonization of deepTibetan Plateau regions and the trans-Himalayas | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 5 2013, 12:42:37 PM (443 Views) | |
| lay dialectologist | Jun 5 2013, 12:42:37 PM Post #1 |
|
advanced member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
According to p. 9 of Discoveries in Western Tibet and the Western Himalayas, the Mustang caves in Kashmir were inhabited as early as 1000 BCE (van Driem) by people with "Mongolian" biological affinities, so the earliest settlements of Tibeto-Burmans in the Himalayas probably goes back to 1000 BCE. These people, however, are very different culturally from the cultures that correspond to Zhang Zhung, who spoke a Tibeto-Burman language that has been sparsely recorded in texts and who appear starting 500 BCE. All in all the first appearance of Tibeto-Burman peoples in the trans-Himalayas seems to be 1000 BCE and on the Plateau itself seems to be 500 BCE, which is kind of paradoxical. Bradley (2002) says Zhangzhung "is now agreed to have been a Kanauri or West Himalayish language." Guillaume Jacques (2009) rebuts earlier hypotheses that Zhangzhung might have originated in eastern (rather than western) Tibet by having determined it to be a non-Qiangic language.[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhangzhung_language Languages of the Himalayas: Handbuch der Orientalistik / hrsg. von B. Spuler ... By George van Driem 427 Bhutan In a recent archaeological study, Meyer et al. (2009) reported evidence of human inhabitation in northwestern Bhutan as early as 4280 ± 130 cal BP. This data is consonant with the general idea that the earliest inhabitation of Bhutan is 2000 BCE (e.g. Chakravarti 1979 and the National Musem in Paro, Bhutan). Unaware of the archaeological evidence in northwestern Bhutan, sources such as Chakravarti (1979) and Savada (1993) cite the presence of stone tools and weapons, megaliths, large stone structures, and absence of neolithic mythological legends14 as evidence of inhabitation in 2000 BC. According to Savada (1993), there is evidence in Bhutanese and Tibetan chronicles that Lhomon or Monyul was a kingdom present in modern-day Bhutan, existing between 500 BC and AD 600. Lho is a Tibetan word for ‘south’, mon may refer to ‘without religion’, or a generic ethnolinguistic term for non-Tibetans and non- Indians15, and yul means ‘country’. source: CHAPTER IV: LINGUISTIC HISTORY OF BHUTAN Edited by lay dialectologist, Aug 2 2013, 09:18:24 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Yangshao Culture main · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z6.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)


